Introducing Pre- and Post-Marital Agreements

Introducing Pre- and Post-Marital Agreements

Marriage today is more complex than ever given the high rates of divorce, second marriages, blended families, and increasing globalization of couples. Anyone with significant property, an inheritance, a family business, or children from a prior marriage ought to consider a pre-marital agreement. Those entering a same sex marriage or civil union should also consider one. If the couple is multinational or goes global, there could be unintended changes to property ownership and tax consequences.

What additional considerations should a couple take into account in planning for their marriage and the pre-marital agreements? While different sources present different lists, in 2012 the following were the counties with the highest divorce rates:

  1. Russia
  2. Aruba
  3. USA
  4. Panama
  5. Ukraine
  6. Belarus
  7. Moldova
  8. Cuba
  9. Czech Republic
  10. South Korea

More striking is the fact that in the United States, the rate of divorce for 1st marriages is approximately 50%, for 2nd marriages 60% and for 3rd marriages 70%. [https://www.divorcestatistics.info/divorce-statistics-and-divorce-rate-in-the-usa.html]

A premarital agreement may be one way to address issues not just upon divorce or death, but upon a move to a new jurisdiction.

This paper will examine the premarital agreement (including the international premarital agreement) and postmarital agreement, what they seek to achieve, tax and other considerations including planning for same sex couples, common law marriages, and couples on the move.

The Premarital Agreement and the Postmarital Agreement

Definition:

  • Premarital Agreement: A premarital agreement (or prenuptial or ante-nuptial agreement) is a contract between a couple prior to marriage or a civil union that typically provides how property owned before or acquired during the marriage will be divided in case of divorce or at death and can provide for alimony or maintenance. The agreement can be as broad or as limited in scope as the couple desires, except certain jurisdictions, including the United States, do not allow a marital agreement to govern child support or child custody rights.
  • Postmarital Agreement: A postmarital agreement seeks to achieve the same objectives as a premarital agreement, but it is entered into after the couple is married.
  • International Premarital Agreement: There is no such thing as an “international premarital agreement” per se. If more than one jurisdiction is involved, a couple should consider the law of each such jurisdiction. These different jurisdictions may include: where the couple celebrates their marriage, their first marital abode, their nationality, their residence, their domicile, and the location of their assets. In some instances, any one of these factors could connect the couple to a particular jurisdiction thereby requiring the advisor to look to the law of that jurisdiction. Not all countries recognize premarital agreements so one must always consult local counsel. When a couple is married, their advisor should review the nationalities of the couple, their residence, and the location of their assets. The law of the country that will govern the dissolution of the marriage may affect the marital regime or the use of a pre or postmarital agreement. For instance, some countries do not consider pre and post-nuptial agreements to be valid, so some couples will be unable to vary their marital regimes.

Legal and Tax considerations

The primary objective of a premarital agreement is to settle property rights in case of divorce or at death and maintenance in the case of divorce.  Except for child support, a couple is free to enter into any type of agreement they wish. There are many important issues to consider, such as:

  • Choice of Marital Regime:  In some jurisdictions( e.g., France), the parties are free to choose their marital regime e.g., separation de biens, communaute universelle or communaute reduite  aux acquets. Similarly in Germany, one can override the “default” marital regime of community o accrued gains or “Zugewinngemeinschat” by selecting other optional marital regimes such as exclusion of any community o property (“Gutertrennung”) or of general community of property (“Gutergemeinschat”).  In the United States, if the parties reside in a common law (separate property state) they cannot choose community property as their marital regime. This may be an oddity of U.S. tax law which permits a double basis step up upon the death of one spouse for those residing in community property states.
  • Definition of Non-Marital or Separate Property: This includes property owned before marriage, gifts and inheritances, including in some states interest and dividends earned by that property.  Non-marital property typically is not divided on a divorce and will pass on death without a claim by the surviving spouse.  However, a couple could agree to use non-marital property for the purchase of a residence and that could be treated as marital property.
  • Definition of Marital Property:  This is property acquired after the marriage other than separate property, but the agreement can limit this to only property in joint name or designated in writing as marital property.  The parties can specify how marital property is divided on a divorce or distributed at death.
  • Wages and Earned Income: Under most state laws, earned income, wages, and Social Security benefits acquired after marriage are marital property.  The agreement can provide, however, that earned income is to be treated as non-marital property.
  • Retirement Plans:  Contributions to retirement plans after the marriage are generally treated as marital property.  The couple can agree to allow each party to accumulate retirement benefits separately.  The agreement can also provide that each party may name someone else as the beneficiary, but to be effective the participant’s spouse must sign a waiver of rights to a qualified retirement plan after the marriage.
  • Maintenance or Alimony: A party can agree to waive maintenance or alimony in case of divorce or agree to a specified schedule of payments.   The couple needs to consider the ability of each spouse to support himself or herself after the divorce if circumstances change, such as the birth of a child.  Some states allow a court to award maintenance or alimony if due to unforeseen circumstances the spouse would suffer undue hardship or be eligible for public support at the time of the divorce.
  • Death: The couple can agree on how their property will be distributed on death including the waiver of certain spousal estate rights.  A party is free to name his or her spouse in his or her will or trust or may make lifetime gifts.  The couple may specify how the marital residence will be distributed if the owner dies first.  Sometimes, the surviving spouse is given the right to remain in the residence for period of time after the first spouse’s death. In the absence of an agreement, in common law states, a surviving spouse has a statutory right of election to receive a specified percentage of the probate estate or a fixed percentage of the augmented estate e.g., in Virginia.  In community property states, each spouse has the right to dispose of his or her separate property and one-half of the community property.  With an agreement, a spouse can completely waive all spousal rights including statutory right of election, community property interests, and miscellaneous rights such as homestead allowance, exempt property, and family allowance.
  • Guardianship: Conditions of guardianship may be included as well in some countries, although not in the U.S.

The Premarital and Postmarital Agreement – consider it when tying the knot or thereafter.

Leigh-Alexandra Basha focuses her practice on domestic and international tax and estate planning. She counsels an affluent international client base on a wide range of sophisticated matters, including estate and trust administration, family wealth preservation, foreign trust planning, tax compliance, as well as business succession, expatriation, and pre-immigration planning. Leigh is head of the Firm’s Washington, DC, Private Client Practice Group.

Leigh-Alexandra Basha

Leigh-Alexandra Basha

McDermott Will & Emery
marital agreement

Maud Udry-Alhanko

McDermott Will & Emery
Validity of Premarital Agreements in USA

Validity of Premarital Agreements in USA

Validity of Premarital and Marital Agreements in the USA

All fifty states in the United States recognize the validity of premarital agreements and over half of the states have adopted the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (“UPAA”) adopted in 1983 by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (“NCCUSL”). The UPAA has been adopted by 30 states.[Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin] The states of Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Vermont, Washington, and Wyoming all have other unique legal requirements.

The UPAA encourages the enforceability of premarital agreements and requires that the agreement and any amendment be in writing and signed by both parties. The agreement is effective on the parties’ marriage. In 2012, NCCUSL adopted an updated version entitled the Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act (“UPMAA”) which seeks to address both types of agreements that have led to conflicting laws, judgments, and uncertainty about enforcement as couples move from state to state. The UPMAA has been adopted by Colorado and North Dakota and has been introduced in Nevada and the District of Columbia.

The UPAA provides that parties to a premarital agreement may contract with respect to:

  • The rights and obligations of each of the parties in any of the property of either or both of them whenever and wherever acquired or located.
  • The right to buy, sell, use, transfer, exchange, abandon, lease, consume, expend, assign, create a security interest, mortgage, encumber, dispose of or otherwise manage and control property.
  • The disposition of property on separation, marital dissolution, death or the occurrence or non-occurrence of any other event.
  • The modification or elimination of spouse support.
  • The making of a will, trust or other arrangement to carry out the provisions of the agreement.
  • The ownership rights in and disposition of the death benefit from a life insurance policy.
  • The choice of law governing the construction of the agreement.
  • Finally, any other matter, including the parties’ personal rights and obligations not in violation of public policy or statute imposing a criminal penalty.
  • Premarital agreements may not seek to affect a child’s right to support.

Some jurisdiction provide that post-martial agreements are invalid as against public policy unless incident to a separation or divorce. The UPAA is expressly limited to premarital agreements only. However, premarital agreements may be amended or revoked after marriage provided it is in writing. No consideration is required for such amendment or revocation.[UPAA Sections 2 and 5 (1983)] The UPMMA covers both pre-marital and marital agreements.

The general approach of the UPMAA is that parties should be free within broad limits to choose the financial terms of their marriage, however a significant minority of states authorizes some form of fairness review based on the parties’ circumstances at the time the agreement is to be enforced. A few states put the burden of proof on the party seeking enforcement of marital and, more rarely, pre-marital agreements.

The UPMAA chooses to treat premarital agreements and marital agreements under the same set of principles and requirements. A number of states currently treat pre-marital agreements and marital agreements under different legal standards with higher burdens on those who wish to enforce marital agreements. The UPMAA takes a position that the UPMAA and common law principles are sufficient to deal with the likely problems related to both pre- and post-marital agreements.

Under the UPMAA, a premarital agreement or marital agreement may include terms not in violation of public policy including terms relating to: (1) rights of either or both spouses to an interest in a trust, inheritance, devise, gift and expectancy created by a third party; (2) appointment of fiduciary, guardian, conservator, personal representative or agent for person or property; (3) a tax matter; (4) the method for resolving a dispute arising under the agreement; (5) choice of law governing validity, enforceability, interpretation and construction of the agreements; or (6) formalities required to amend the agreement.

The UPMAA is meant to exclude separation agreements and marital settlement agreements from the scope of the UPMAA as those tend to have their own established standards for enforcement.

A premarital agreement is effective on marriage. A marital agreement is effective on signing by both parties. In neither event is consideration required. Marriage itself is considered consideration. https://www.mwe.com

Leigh-Alexandra Basha

Leigh-Alexandra Basha

McDermott Will & Emery
marital agreement

Maud Udry-Alhanko

McDermott Will & Emery